We want your input!

  • Tell us how to improve by submitting ๐Ÿ’ก Suggestions or ๐Ÿ› Bug Reports.

  • We have different board for each, choose on the right side of the screen (above if on mobile).

  • WARNING: You can not edit a submission once you post it, you can only add more comments/reply. Make sure you have all the info in there that you want.

In Progress

Dashboard GUI - Ideas about hosts and owners

Being both a host and owner of stations, there are a few things Iโ€™m lacking in the current dashboard; First of all, it would be nice to be able to invite hosts to Wingbits as users, being able to log in to their account and watch the progress/status of โ€œtheirโ€ station(s) - giving them a greater insight to the project, adding transparency and a greater reason to โ€œcareโ€ for your hosted station - possibly even enticing them to deploy their own station(s). When adding a host wallet - instead of, or in addition to, entering the hosts wallet address, owners should be able to create an invite link so that the host user can create a new account to view that station or add that hosting station to their existing Wingbits account. The hosting user should be able to see their current cut of each hosted station (% still determined by the owner), and be able to add/change the wallet address for each station individually (to be able to use different wallets or change wallets). Currently, the rewards history does not take into account your share of a station, but assumes a 100% share. Nor does it allow you to see your rewards from hosted stations. For both hosts and owners, when looking at the dashboard rewards history, Iโ€™d like them to be able to see both the rewards that they get and the total rewards for a station (possibly also the rewards for other hosts for that station, if there are several โ€œhostsโ€ - e.g. one for location, one for technical support or whatever). All this information does not all have to be visible in one โ€œviewโ€, nor do I think it should, but Iโ€™ll leave that up to those more skilled in UI design to figure out.

fredrik.hedgren Over 1 year ago

3

๐Ÿ’ก Suggestions

Multiple Wallets and Revenue Splitting per Mining Location

Summary: Currently, it's not possible to assign multiple wallets to a single mining location or split revenue between different stakeholders directly at the location level. This creates difficulties in managing profit sharing with location owners and regional partners, and also complicates tax reporting when needing to separate income streams for specific locations involving third parties. Problem Description: Complex Revenue Sharing: For users with multiple miners and partnerships, there's a need to distribute mining revenue among various parties (e.g., miner owner, location owner, regional partner) based on pre-defined percentages. The current system, allowing only one wallet per location, makes this process manual and cumbersome. Taxation and Income Separation: When a location owner is involved, it's desirable to have separate wallets to clearly distinguish the miner owner's taxable income from the location owner's share. The inability to add a second wallet for the same location for this purpose is a limitation. Proposed Solution: Implement the ability to associate multiple wallets with a single mining location. For each location, allow users to: Add Multiple Wallets: Enable the creation or assignment of more than one wallet to a specific mining location. Define Percentage Splits: Allow users to specify a percentage of the mining revenue to be automatically distributed to each wallet associated with that location. The sum of these percentages for a single location must equal 100%. Use Cases: Three-Way Revenue Split: Scenario: A miner owner has a regional partner who finds locations, and there's also a location owner. Desired Outcome: For a specific mining location, create three wallets with the following revenue distribution: Wallet 1 (Miner Owner): 50% Wallet 2 (Location Owner): 25% Wallet 3 (Regional Partner): 25% Two-Way Revenue Split for Tax Purposes & Location Owner Payout: Scenario: A miner owner needs to pay a percentage of the revenue to the location owner and wants to keep their own share in a separate wallet for clear tax reporting. Desired Outcome: For a specific mining location, create two wallets: Wallet 1 (Miner Owner - Tax Location Wallet): 70% Wallet 2 (Location Owner): 30% Benefits: Simplified Revenue Management: Automates the process of splitting profits among multiple stakeholders. Improved Transparency: Clear allocation of funds for all parties involved. Easier Tax Reporting: Facilitates the separation of income for tax purposes. Scalability: Makes it easier to manage an increasing number of miners and complex partnership agreements. Potential for Quick Implementation: The user believes that allowing multiple location wallets for a single location might be a relatively straightforward feature to implement.

wingbits 10 months ago

๐Ÿ’ก Suggestions

Better Alert System

Currently, the alert system in place only notifies you if your station is offline due to missed heartbeats. However, my station has not been working correctly for almost a month despite not missing any heartbeats. I had no idea! I presumed it was working fine since it hadnโ€™t missed any heartbeats and I wasnโ€™t notified via email that anything was wrong. Idea! Please add alert option to notify you when you havenโ€™t earned any WING for a certain period of time (1h, 1d, 3d, 1w, etc). This way you know when youโ€™re station is still putting out heartbeats but otherwise not working as it should. Bummed Iโ€™ve been offline for so long and had no idea. Super frustrating.

matthew.marcus 11 months ago

1

๐Ÿ’ก Suggestions

Feature Suggestions for Improved Accessibility and Security

I sincerely appreciate your hard work on this project. Iโ€™d like to kindly offer two suggestions that I believe would improve the user experience and address common concerns. First, I find bright white screens quite uncomfortable, as they strain my eyes โ€” and I know Iโ€™m not alone. Many users prefer darker themes for both comfort and accessibility. A dark mode option would be a very welcome addition. Second, Iโ€™d really appreciate the ability to disable the WiFi access point (AP) ((toggle)) when itโ€™s not needed. I understand if the default behavior keeps it enabled after a reboot or factory reset, but having the option to turn it off manually would greatly benefit users concerned with privacy, security, or simply reducing unnecessary network signals. Thank you for considering these suggestions. I truly believe they would enhance usability for many of us.

tom84life 8 months ago

2

๐Ÿ’ก Suggestions